Bacon interestingly illustrates that why will a person do wrong to someone? What could be possible reasons behind? If so, then why? The answer is given by bacon himself. Bacon, then, argues that why should I become mad at a person who loves himself more than me? This is then not a well-to-do workout to do.
Bacon suggested that the person taking revenge should make his enemies informed as it might make the opposition party repent. It is more delightful to make one repent than to hurt. But if you take revenge silently by not provoking them, you will be a coward which is like an arrow that could hit anyone in the dark.
Bacon extends his argument about the wrongs that cannot be pardoned. The author quoted the Cosmos, the Duke of Florence that we have read that we are commanded to forgive our enemies, but we have never read that we are commanded to forgive our friends. But still, bacon says, we should not be so much inclined toward avenging them. As we are satisfied to take all good deeds from God but why are we not happy to take evil from him, too?
So, we should forgive even our friends and consider them an evil from the God. A person who is always in sickness to take revenge and searching for a good moment to take will keep his wound evergreen and will never let them cure. In such condition, the only loss is to the sufferer which would otherwise heal and move on and focusing more on his present and future than to remain buried in his past.
Bacon, lastly, ends the essay by arguing that public revenge, on the most past for bad leader or rules is fortunate. In public act of revenge, there is a huge lesson for the public and rest of people as it set an example for other while the private revenge, on the other hand, makes a person, who nourishes evil desires for others, to live a life of witches.
Such life is full of rascal so they end, unfortunately. Such contrast is made by him to show the animalistic nature of revenge. It is characteristic of an animal to avenge not of humans as they are entitled to forgive and show compassion to fellow beings.
Just as by a single statement of wild justice, he presents the whole picture of human and animal life. Moreover, Bacon argues that the first wrong is overseen by law, but avenging it is out of the law. To avenge is a distortion of the law. As wrongs in the past cannot be changed because they are irrevocable, one should move on.
Bacon explains a logical argument for why should one look for to harm others? To him, one might get some profit by harming others, or some pleasure like a sadist or to achieve some honor. If these could be the reasons to do wrong with others then one should not avenge them as you cannot hate someone because they love themselves more than you. Forgive them, and move on. By taking revenge, Bacon argues, one takes the law into his hands.
Law becomes useless if one tries to take revenge. But such type of revenge is bearable which has no lawful remedy. One should make sure, Bacon warns, that there is then no law to punish. Along with this, one should make the opposition informed before avenging them. By ignoring or forgiving the incorrect done to at least one by another makes an individual superior to others because it is that the quality of kings and prince to forgive others. By forbearing others, one makes a good place within society.
By quoting Salomon, a wisest Jewish philosopher, Bacon designates the standard of wise men that a secret of their glory is that they always ignore the wrongs from others. But the wise men specialize in this and that they learn through their previous experiences and apply them within the present. Why should one care about the past as they need much to try to about the present and future? Forgive, forget, and advance. Does Bacon interestingly illustrate that why will an individual do wrong to someone?
What might be possible reasons behind? If so, then why? Bacon, then, argues that why should I become mad at an individual who loves himself quite me? Bacon suggested that the person taking revenge should make his enemies informed because it might make the opposition party repent. But still, bacon says, we should always not be such a lot inclined toward avenging them.
As we are satisfied to require all good deeds from God but why are we not happy to require evil from him, too? So, we should always forgive even our friends and consider them evil from God. A person who is usually in sickness to require revenge and checking out an honest moment to require will keep his wound evergreen and can never allow them to cure.
In such a condition, the sole loss is to the sufferer which might otherwise heal and advance and focusing more on his present and future than to stay buried in his past. Bacon, lastly, ends the essay by arguing that public revenge, on the foremost past for bad leaders or rules is fortunate. Such life is filled with rascal so that they end, unfortunately. Such contrast is formed by him to point out the animalistic nature of revenge. To avenge may be a distortion of the law. Does Bacon explain an argumentation for why should one search for to harm others?
To him, one might get some profit by harming others, or some pleasure sort of a sadist, or to realize some honor. Forgive them, and advance. By taking revenge, Bacon argues, one takes the law into his hands. Law becomes useless if one tries to require revenge. But such sort of revenge is bearable which has no lawful remedy.
This might make them sorry which is more worth than harming them. We can forgive the wrongs done by enemies because we expect them to try to so, but what about the wrongs that are done to us by our beloved friend, are such wrongs forgivable? Bacon seems to vary his opinion against taking revenge by quoting Cosmus, the Duke of Florence, that we are commanded to forgive enemies but we are never commanded to forgive friends.
Bacon is completely against private revenge but suggests that public acts of revenge are for the foremost part fortunate because it set an example for all. On the opposite hand, private revenge is unfortunate. The one that takes revenge lives a lifetime of witches and his wound never heals. The following are the most theme of the essay Of Revenge.
A firm believer of the law, Bacon mostly criticizes revenge, and argues that it is more honourable to avoid revenge altogether as it is a misguided form of justice. The act of forgiving wrongdoers is not easy, it takes the utmost form of compassion for one to ignore and move on from scarring wounds; after all, to indulge in the gratifying pleasure of vindictiveness is much easier.
He further elaborates by saying, Through this quote, it is clear that Bacon holds a stance of moral superiority as he claims that it is futile to be bitter about what has already passed. To him, the past is now of history and cannot be changed, therefore, those that are wise know not to concern themselves with the past but rather the present and what lies ahead.
Bacon then contemplates the motivations behind those that commit wrongful crimes: According to him, it is rare for a man to commit an immoral act for the sake of it, instead there are benefits to be had, such as money or pleasure. Viewing through a lens of consideration for others, Bacon rhetorically asks why must he be angry then, at those that seek to love themselves? Instead of criminalizing those that commit such acts, he understands that they too, are driven by a compulsion to better their life; furthermore, he compares the likes of those that merely act out of malice to that of a thorn, which solely serves to prick others as its purpose; similarly, a man of ill-nature is cursed to hurt others, as they have no other purpose in life other than to cause mayhem to society; finally, Bacon wraps up his main idea with Cosmus, the Duke of Florence, who held grudges against his deceitful friends and never pardoned them.
He contrasts Cosmus with the Biblical character, Job, who ponders about how man accepts what he likes from god yet rejects what he does not like from god. In this case, while being appreciating the good, man should also accept that immorality exists and that vengeance is not the answer to it. Additionally, Bacon realizes that What he is referring to is that those who are vengeful and maintain grudges, only disallow themselves to heal and move on from their wounded past.
On that note, Bacon finishes with the acknowledgement of two revenges: Public revenge and Private revenge. Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student. Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. We will occasionally send you account related emails. This essay is not unique.
This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers. This is not going against the law and the person is acting to serve justice. Public revenge can uplift a nation or cause civil rebellion as this often is associated with assassinations or taking vengeance against wrongful rulers who misuse powers to form a tyrannical government.
Julius Caesar was stabbed by senators led by Brutus, Pertinax killed by a guard and Henry the Third of France assassinated by Jacques Clement are all examples in history portraying public revenge as a necessary evil. On the other hand, private revenge can lead to a lot of suspicions and is often restricted to the burning rage of one individual against another.
Sir Francis Bacon always striven for a civilized world with science at its center; therefore, he emphasizes more on laws than working as outlaws or vigilantes seeking justice where the law does not permit. It is a moral question whether to harm another and he quotes wise Solomon explaining that people who can get past their vengeful thoughts are noble and are above their enemy. Despite human nature, there is nothing one could do to bring the past or right a wrongful event; it is only wise to let go of the past injuries and carry on with life.
Bacon believes wrongfully that those who want vengeance would like to see the enemy repent rather bleed. However, most harm the enemy to watch them suffer and cruelty to satisfy the rage is present. There is a contradiction about betraying friends and Bacon quotes Cosmus, the Duke of Florence and the Biblical figure Job. Cosmus reiterates that friends who betray should not be pardoned and should be punished. Here, Bacon touches the two minds and the opinion is left to the reader about being what kind of friend, if in case, a betrayal arises.
Of Revenge carefully explains the probabilities of vengeance, predicament of a person before and after, wise and foolish decisions one can take and the fact that there is nothing one can do to bring back a person or an event that has become a mere memory of the past. Sir Francis Bacon being a man of science expects humans to step out of their barbaric nature and proceed lawfully to bring justice.
Francis Bacon — Of Revenge — Summary Revenge is unlawful and more it persists, the more need there is to take care of the problem. Francis Bacon — Of Revenge — Analysis The essay talks about wild justice, morality, irrevocable past, justification of revenge, types of vengeance, psychology of it and what great men of the past opined about it.
Types In the essay, Bacon speaks of four kinds of revenge namely unlawful vengeance, revenge existing above the law, public and private vengeance. Wild Justice Sir Francis Bacon always striven for a civilized world with science at its center; therefore, he emphasizes more on laws than working as outlaws or vigilantes seeking justice where the law does not permit.